Politics of Argentina
Politics of Argentina | |
|---|---|
| Polity type | Federal presidential representative republic |
| Constitution | Constitution of Argentina |
| Legislative branch | |
| Name | National Congress |
| Type | Bicameral |
| Meeting place | Palace of the Argentine National Congress |
| Upper house | |
| Name | Senate |
| Presiding officer | Victoria Villarruel, Vice President of Argentina & President of the Senate |
| Lower house | |
| Name | Chamber of Deputies |
| Presiding officer | Martín Menem |
| Executive branch | |
| Head of state and government | |
| Title | President |
| Currently | Javier Milei |
| Cabinet | |
| Current cabinet | Ministries of the Argentine Republic |
| Headquarters | Casa Rosada |
| Ministries | 10 |
| Judicial branch | |
| Name | Judiciary of Argentina |
| Supreme Court | |
| Chief judge | Horacio Rosatti |
| Argentina portal |
The politics of Argentina take place in the framework of what the Constitution defines as a federal presidential representative democratic republic, where the President of Argentina is both Head of State and Head of Government. Legislative power is vested in the two chambers of the Argentine National Congress. The Judiciary is independent, as are the Executive and the Legislature. Elections take place regularly on a multi-party system.
In the 20th century, Argentina experienced significant political turmoil and democratic reversals. Argentina's first episode of democratization started with the 1912 Argentine legislative election and ended with the 1930 Argentine coup d'état. Between 1930 and 1976, the armed forces overthrew six governments in Argentina. Some historians see between military rule and periods of restricted democracy also periods of democracy (1946–1955, and 1973–1976), while other sources only consider the period 1963–1965 as barely meeting the standards of democratic transition.
Following a democratization that began in 1983, full-scale democracy in Argentina was reestablished. Argentina's democracy endured through the 2001–02 crisis and to the present day; it is regarded as more robust than both its pre-1983 predecessors and other democracies in Latin America.