Crooker v. California
| Crooker v. California | |
|---|---|
| Argued April 2, 1958 Decided June 30, 1958 | |
| Full case name | Crooker v. California |
| Docket no. | 178 |
| Citations | 357 U.S. 433 (more) 78 S. Ct. 1287, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1448, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 665 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | conviction; affirmed 47 Cal. 2d 348, 303 P.2d 753 (1956), cert. granted 354 U.S. 908 (1957) |
| Holding | |
| A criminal suspect's confession during pre-trial interrogation may be used as evidence, notwithstanding that he was refused the right to an attorney, when the suspect is well-educated, and when it is not proven that the trial was rendered fundamentally unjust and unfair. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Clark, joined by Frankfurter, Burton, Harlan, Whittaker |
| Dissent | Douglas, joined by Warren, Black, Brennan |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amends. V, VI | |
Overruled by | |
| Escobedo v. Illinois (in part) Miranda v. Arizona (in full) | |
Crooker v. California, 357 U.S. 433 (1958), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that limited criminal suspects' constitutional right to counsel before trial, refusing to overturn a subsequent conviction without a showing that the refusal of counsel had a coercive or prejudicial effect. This holding was later overturned by Escobedo v. Illinois and Miranda v. Arizona.