Cunningham v. Cornell University
| Cunningham v. Cornell University | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 22, 2025 Decided April 17, 2025 | |
| Full case name | Casey Cunningham, et al. v. Cornell University, et al. |
| Docket no. | 23-1007 |
| Citations | 604 U.S. ____ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Decision | Opinion |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by unanimous |
| Concurrence | Alito, joined by Thomas and Kavanaugh |
| Laws applied | |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. §§ 1106–1108) | |
Cunningham v. Cornell University, 604 U.S. ____, is a United States Supreme Court case holding that conflict of interest claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 do not need to address exceptions in the initial pleading.