First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
| First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 22, 1995 Decided May 22, 1995 | |
| Full case name | First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Manuel Kaplan, et us. and MK Investments, Incorporated |
| Citations | 514 U.S. 938 (more) 115 S. Ct. 1920; 131 L. Ed. 2d 985; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3463; 63 U.S.L.W. 4459; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 98,728; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 26,398; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3821; 95 Daily Journal DAR 6474; 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 64 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
| Holding | |
| Judicial review of arbitrability of contract is properly permitted when parties have not clearly agreed that arbitrator will decide question | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on who decides whether a dispute is subject to arbitration, the courts or an arbitrator.