Florida v. Jimeno
| Florida v. Jimeno | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 25, 1991 Decided May 23, 1991 | |
| Full case name | Florida v. Enio Jimeno |
| Citations | 500 U.S. 248 (more) 111 S. Ct. 1801; 114 L. Ed. 2d 297 |
| Holding | |
| Jimeno's consent to the search of the car did extend to the closed paper bag within the car, and did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter |
| Dissent | Marshall, joined by Stevens |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. IV | |
Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the exclusionary rule of evidence under the Fourth Amendment.