Florida v. White
| Florida v. White | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 23, 1999 Decided May 17, 1999 | |
| Full case name | Florida v. Tyvessel Tyvorus White |
| Citations | 526 U.S. 559 (more) 710 So. L. Ed. 2d 949 |
| Holding | |
| The Fourth Amendment does not require the police to obtain a warrant before seizing a vehicle from a public place if there is probable cause that it is forfeitable contraband | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, |
| Concurrence | Souter, joined by Breyer |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Ginsburg |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. IV | |
Florida v. White, 526 U.S. 559 (1999), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the exclusionary rule of evidence under the Fourth Amendment.