In mathematics, the Möbius energy of a knot is a particular knot energy, i.e., a functional on the space of knots.  It was discovered by Jun O'Hara, who demonstrated that the energy blows up as the knot's strands get close to one another.  This is a useful property because it prevents self-intersection and ensures the result under gradient descent is of the same knot type.
Invariance of Möbius energy under Möbius transformations was demonstrated by Michael Freedman, Zheng-Xu He, and Zhenghan Wang (1994) who used it to show the existence of a  energy minimizer in each isotopy class of a prime knot.  They also showed the minimum energy of any knot conformation is achieved by a round circle.
 energy minimizer in each isotopy class of a prime knot.  They also showed the minimum energy of any knot conformation is achieved by a round circle.
Conjecturally, there is no energy minimizer for composite knots. Robert B. Kusner and John M. Sullivan have done computer experiments with a discretized version of the Möbius energy and concluded that there should be no energy minimizer for the knot sum of two trefoils (although this is not a proof).
Recall that the Möbius  transformations of the 3-sphere 
 are the ten-dimensional group of angle-preserving diffeomorphisms generated by inversion in 2-spheres. For example, the inversion in the sphere
 are the ten-dimensional group of angle-preserving diffeomorphisms generated by inversion in 2-spheres. For example, the inversion in the sphere  is defined by
 is defined by 

Consider a rectifiable simple curve  in the Euclidean 
3-space
 in the Euclidean 
3-space  , where
, where  belongs to
 belongs to  or
 or  . Define its energy by
. Define its energy by
 
where  is the shortest arc 
distance between
 is the shortest arc 
distance between  and
and  on the curve. The second term of the 
integrand is called a
regularization. It is easy to see that
 on the curve. The second term of the 
integrand is called a
regularization. It is easy to see that  is
independent of parametrization and is unchanged if
 is
independent of parametrization and is unchanged if  is changed by a similarity of
  is changed by a similarity of  . Moreover, the energy of any line is 0, the energy of any circle is
. Moreover, the energy of any line is 0, the energy of any circle is  . In fact, let us use the arc-length parameterization. Denote by
. In fact, let us use the arc-length parameterization. Denote by  the length of the curve
 the length of the curve  . Then
. Then
![{\displaystyle E(\gamma )=\int _{-\ell /2}^{\ell /2}{}dx\int _{x-\ell /2}^{x+\ell /2}\left[{1 \over |\gamma (x)-\gamma (y)|^{2}}-{1 \over |x-y|^{2}}\right]dy.}](./5e43d9199c18fbaa3d6a68120731f9ea2827e48c.svg) 
Let  denote a unit circle. We have
 denote a unit circle. We have
 
and consequently,
 
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}E(\gamma _{0})&=\int _{-\pi }^{\pi }{}dx\int _{x-\pi }^{x+\pi }\left[{1 \over \left(2\sin {\tfrac {1}{2}}(x-y)\right)^{2}}-{1 \over |x-y|^{2}}\right]dy\\&=4\pi \int _{0}^{\pi }\left[{1 \over \left(2\sin(y/2)\right)^{2}}-{1 \over |y|^{2}}\right]dy\\&=2\pi \int _{0}^{\pi /2}\left[{1 \over \sin ^{2}y}-{1 \over |y|^{2}}\right]dy\\&=2\pi \left[{1 \over u}-\cot u\right]_{u=0}^{\pi /2}=4\end{aligned}}}](./a6f5bb41c38af406eadd5473e037bb9b040c7c42.svg) 
since  .
.