Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.
| Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 13, 1948 Decided February 16, 1948 | |
| Full case name | Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. |
| Citations | 333 U.S. 127 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 161 F.2d 981 (7th Cir. 1947) (reversed) |
| Holding | |
| The properties of inhibition or of noninhibition in the bacteria were "the work of nature" and therefore not subject to being patented. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Douglas, joined by Vinson, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Murphy, Rutledge |
| Concurrence | Frankfurter |
| Dissent | Burton, joined by Jackson |
| Laws applied | |
| 35 U.S.C. § 31 | |
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that a facially trivial implementation of a natural principle or phenomenon of nature is not eligible for a patent.