Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk
| Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk | |
|---|---|
| Argued December 3, 2012 Decided April 16, 2013 | |
| Full case name | Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk |
| Docket no. | 11-1059 |
| Citations | 569 U.S. 66 (more) 133 S. Ct. 1523; 185 L. Ed. 2d 636; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3157; 81 U.S.L.W. 4229 |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 656 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2011); cert. granted, 567 U.S. 933 (2012). |
| Holding | |
| Because respondent had no personal interest in representing putative, unnamed claimants, nor any other continuing interest that would preserve her suit from mootness, her suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito |
| Dissent | Kagan, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
| Laws applied | |
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk, 569 U.S. 66 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the justiciability doctrine of mootness.