Hale v. Henkel
| Hale v. Henkel | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 4–5, 1906 Decided March 12, 1906 | |
| Full case name | Edwin F. Hale, Appt., v. William Henkel, United States Marshall |
| Citations | 201 U.S. 43 (more) 26 S. Ct. 370; 50 L. Ed. 652 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern District of New York |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Brown, joined by Harlan, White, Peckham, McKenna, Holmes, Day |
| Concurrence | Harlan |
| Concurrence | McKenna |
| Dissent | Brewer, joined by Fuller |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amends. IV, V | |
Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906), was a major United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established the power of a federal grand jury engaged in an investigation into corporate malfeasance to require the corporation in question to surrender its records.