Hill v. Colorado

Hill v. Colorado
Hill v. Colorado
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 19, 2000; Decided June 28, 2000
Full case name	Leila Jeanne Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
Docket no.	98-1856
Citations	530 U.S. 703 (more)
Argument	Oral argument
Case history
Prior	Cert. granted, Hill v. Colorado, 527 U.S. 1068 (1999).; Affirmed, Hill v. Thomas, 973 P.2d 1246 (Colo. 1999).; Affirmed, Hill v. City of Lakewood, 973 P.2d 1246 (Colo. 1999).; Granted, vacated, and remanded, Hill v. Colorado, 519 U.S. 1145 (1997).; Cert. denied (Colorado Supreme Court).; Affirmed, Hill v. City of Lakewood 911 P.2d 670 (Colo. App. 1995).; Summary judgment granted to defendants.;
Holding
	Section 18–9–122(3)’s restrictions on speech-related conduct are constitutional.
Court membership
	Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor; Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; David Souter · Clarence Thomas; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
Majority	Stevens, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence	Souter, joined by O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent	Scalia, joined by Thomas
Dissent	Kennedy
Laws applied
	U.S. Const. amend. I; Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18–9–122(3) (1999)

Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision regarding the First Amendment. The Court ruled 6–3 that the right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.

Hill v. Colorado
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 19, 2000 Decided June 28, 2000
Full case name	Leila Jeanne Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
Docket no.	98-1856
Citations	530 U.S. 703 (more)
Argument	Oral argument
Case history
Prior	Cert. granted, Hill v. Colorado, 527 U.S. 1068 (1999). Affirmed, Hill v. Thomas, 973 P.2d 1246 (Colo. 1999). Affirmed, Hill v. City of Lakewood, 973 P.2d 1246 (Colo. 1999). Granted, vacated, and remanded, Hill v. Colorado, 519 U.S. 1145 (1997). Cert. denied (Colorado Supreme Court). Affirmed, Hill v. City of Lakewood 911 P.2d 670 (Colo. App. 1995). Summary judgment granted to defendants.
Holding
Section 18–9–122(3)’s restrictions on speech-related conduct are constitutional.
Court membership
Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy David Souter · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
Majority	Stevens, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence	Souter, joined by O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent	Scalia, joined by Thomas
Dissent	Kennedy
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18–9–122(3) (1999)