Kansas v. Glover
| Kansas v. Glover | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 4, 2019 Decided April 6, 2020  | |
| Full case name | Kansas v. Charles Glover | 
| Docket no. | 18-556 | 
| Citations | 589 U.S. ___ (more) 140 S. Ct. 1183; 206 L. Ed. 2d 412  | 
| Case history | |
| Prior | |
| Subsequent | Conviction affirmed on remand, 465 P.3d 165 (Kan. 2020) | 
| Holding | |
| When the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is driving the vehicle, an investigative traffic stop made after running a vehicle’s license plate and learning that the registered owner’s driver’s license has been revoked is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
  | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh | 
| Concurrence | Kagan, joined by Ginsburg | 
| Dissent | Sotomayor | 
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. IV | |
Kansas v. Glover, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held when a police officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is driving a vehicle, an investigative traffic stop made after running a vehicle's license plate and learning that the registered owner's driver's license has been revoked is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.