National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
| NCUA v. First National Bank & Trust | |
|---|---|
| Argued October 6, 1997 Decided February 25, 1998 | |
| Full case name | National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co. et al. |
| Citations | 522 U.S. 479 (more) 118 S. Ct. 927; 140 L. Ed. 2d 1 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin., 772 F. Supp. 609 (D.D.C. 1991), reversed, 988 F.2d 1272 (D.C. Cir. 1993); cert. denied, 510 U.S. 907 (1993); on remand, 863 F. Supp. 9 (D.D.C. 1994); reversed, 90 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 1996); cert. granted, 519 U.S. 1148 (1997). |
| Subsequent | None |
| Holding | |
| Respondents have standing under the APA to seek review of the NCUA's interpretation of disputed statute because their claim was within the "zone of interest" of the statute. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Scalia (except as to footnote 6) |
| Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Breyer |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Credit Union Act | |
National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 522 U.S. 479 (1998), is a 1998 legal case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that banks had prudential standing to challenge regulations that permitted credit unions to enroll unaffiliated members.