New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB
| New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 23, 2010 Decided June 17, 2010 | |
| Full case name | New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board |
| Docket no. | 08-1457 |
| Citations | 560 U.S. 674 (more) 130 S. Ct. 2635; 177 L. Ed. 2d 162 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009); cert. granted, 558 U.S. 989 (2009). |
| Holding | |
| A statute requiring the National Labor Relations Board to decide cases with a three-member quorum does not allow two of them to work despite a vacancy on the ground that they constitute a majority of the quorum. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stevens, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito |
| Dissent | Kennedy, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
| Laws applied | |
| Taft–Hartley Act | |
New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. 674 (2010), is a U.S. labor law case of the United States Supreme Court holding that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) cannot make decisions without at least three members on a panel.