In measure theory, given a measurable space  and a signed measure
 and a signed measure  on it, a set
 on it, a set  is called a positive set for
 is called a positive set for  if every
 if every  -measurable subset of
-measurable subset of  has nonnegative measure; that is, for every
 has nonnegative measure; that is, for every  that satisfies
 that satisfies  
  holds.
 holds.
Similarly, a set  is called a negative set for
 is called a negative set for  if for every subset
 if for every subset  satisfying
 satisfying  
  holds.
 holds.
Intuitively, a measurable set  is positive (resp. negative) for
 is positive (resp. negative) for  if
 if  is nonnegative (resp. nonpositive) everywhere on
 is nonnegative (resp. nonpositive) everywhere on  Of course, if
 Of course, if  is a nonnegative measure, every element of
 is a nonnegative measure, every element of  is a positive set for
 is a positive set for 
In the light of Radon–Nikodym theorem, if  is a σ-finite positive measure such that
 is a σ-finite positive measure such that  a set
 a set  is a positive set for
 is a positive set for  if and only if the Radon–Nikodym derivative
 if and only if the Radon–Nikodym derivative  is nonnegative
 is nonnegative  -almost everywhere on
-almost everywhere on  Similarly, a negative set is a set where
 Similarly, a negative set is a set where  
  -almost everywhere.
-almost everywhere.