Rice v. Rehner
| Rice v. Rehner | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 21, 1983 Decided July 1, 1983 | |
| Full case name | Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California v. Eva Rehner |
| Citations | 463 U.S. 713 (more) 103 S. Ct. 3291; 77 L. Ed. 2d 961 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Rehner v. Rice, 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1982) |
| Holding | |
| California may properly require respondent to obtain a state license in order to sell liquor for off-premises consumption. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | O'Connor, joined by Burger, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
| Laws applied | |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1161 | |
Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held California may properly require respondent to obtain a state license in order to sell liquor for off-premises consumption.