Salehuddin Ahmed (economist)

Salehuddin Ahmed
সালেহউদ্দিন আহমেদ
Ahmed in 2024
Adviser for Finance
Assumed office
9 August 2024
PresidentMohammed Shahabuddin
Chief AdviserMuhammad Yunus
Preceded byAbul Hassan Mahmood Ali
Adviser for Science and Technology
Assumed office
22 August 2024
PresidentMohammed Shahabuddin
Chief AdviserMuhammad Yunus
Preceded byYeafesh Osman
Adviser for Commerce
In office
16 August 2024  10 November 2024
PresidentMohammed Shahabuddin
Chief AdviserMuhammad Yunus
Preceded byAhasanul Islam Titu
Succeeded bySheikh Bashir Uddin
Adviser for Planning
In office
9 August 2024  16 August 2024
PresidentMohammed Shahabuddin
Chief AdviserMuhammad Yunus
Preceded byAbdus Salam
Succeeded byWahiduddin Mahmud
Governor of Bangladesh Bank
In office
30 April 2005  1 May 2009
President
Prime Minister
Preceded byFakhruddin Ahmed
Succeeded byAtiur Rahman
Personal details
Born (1949-10-08) 8 October 1949
Nazirabazar, Bengal, British India
NationalityBangladeshi
Political partyIndependent
EducationBA, MA, PhD
Alma materUniversity of Dhaka (BA, MA)
McMaster University (PhD)

Salehuddin Ahmed (born 1949) is a Bangladeshi economist, who has served as the finance adviser to the interim government of Bangladesh since August 2024. He is also a former governor of the Bangladesh Bank.

During his tenure as finance adviser, his move to dissolve the National Board of Revenue and bring revenue management under his direct ministerial control has been criticized as executive capture of the revenue sector. Transparency International Bangladesh and the Centre for Policy Dialogue argued that Ahmed's initiative undermined the autonomy of the revenue service, weakened accountability, and reduced transparency and neutrality. They also said that the initiative ignored the recommendations of the government’s own advisory committee on revenue reform and risked weaponizing taxes and tariffs, worsening existing systemic problems and bureaucratic dysfunction.

Salehuddin Ahmed has also faced criticism for prioritizing Bangladesh's international image over addressing substantive domestic issues, stating that "excessive criticism of the government does not leave a good impression internationally" and damages the country's image abroad, suggesting a defensive approach that deflects from real problems.