Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
| Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. | |
|---|---|
| Argued October 14–15, 1915 Decided February 21, 1916  | |
| Full case name | Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company | 
| Citations | 240 U.S. 103 (more) 36 S.Ct. 278; 60 L. Ed. 546, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1431  | 
| Case history | |
| Prior | Injunction denied (D. Mass.) | 
| Holding | |
| Despite taxing mining companies' capital to a degree, income taxes are not direct taxes and so need not be apportioned to be valid. Affirmed. | |
| Court membership | |
  | |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | White, joined by unanimous | 
| McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. Amend. XVI, Revenue Act of 1913 | |
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916), is a United States Supreme Court case.