Trevino v. Thaler

Trevino v. Thaler
Argued February 25, 2013
Decided May 28, 2013
Full case nameTrevino v. Thaler
Docket no.11-10189
Citations569 U.S. 413 (more)
133 S. Ct. 1911
Holding
Expanded narrow exception to Coleman v. Thompson created by Martinez v. Ryan to state procedural schemes that deny criminal defendants a "meaningful opportunity" to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityBreyer, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
DissentRoberts, joined by Alito
DissentScalia, joined by Thomas

Trevino v. Thaler, 569 US 413, was a 2013 United States Supreme Court decision that applied the narrow exception to Coleman v. Thompson's rule recognized by Martinez v. Ryan to excuse ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) claims that were procedurally defaulted under Texas state law. Martinez recognized a right to counsel in an initial-review collateral proceeding where state law did not allow ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) claims to be raised until post-conviction proceedings because there is no constitutional right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings. Even though Texas law allowed IAC claims to be raised on direct appeal the Court found that the state's procedures did not afford a "meaningful opportunity" to do so and held that the IAC claims raised for the first time in a federal habeas petition were not barred by the procedural default.