United States v. Colgate & Co.
| United States v. Colgate & Co. | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 10, 1919 Decided June 2, 1919 | |
| Full case name | United States v. Colgate & Co. |
| Citations | 250 U.S. 300 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Demurrer sustained, 253 F. 522 (E.D. Va. 1918). |
| Holding | |
| Colgate did not violate the Sherman Act when it cut off agreements with retailers. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | McReynolds |
| Laws applied | |
| Sherman Antitrust Act | |
United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919), is a United States antitrust law case in which the United States Supreme Court noted that a company has the power to decide with whom to do business. Per the Colgate Doctrine, a company may unilaterally terminate business with any other company without triggering a violation of the antitrust laws.
This case created an exception to vertical price restraints in vertical agreements. According to the ruling, resale price maintenance is generally illegal per se, but if a supplier merely says it will not deal with resellers that charge less than the supplier's stipulated price, the supplier need not deal with such a retailer. This is a narrow exception, as companies are still prohibited from threatening or warning price-cutters.