United States v. Line Material Co.
| United States v. Line Material Co. | |
|---|---|
| Argued April 29, 1947 Reargued November 12–13, 1947 Decided March 8, 1948 | |
| Full case name | United States v. Line Material Co. |
| Citations | 333 U.S. 287 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 64 F. Supp. 970 (E.D. Wis. 1946) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Reed, joined by Black, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge |
| Concurrence | Douglas, joined by Black, Murphy, Rutledge |
| Dissent | Burton, joined by Vinson, Frankfurter |
| Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287 (1948), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court limiting the doctrine of the 1926 General Electric decision, excusing price fixing in patent license agreements. The Line Material Court held that cross-licenses between two manufacturer competitors, providing for fixing the prices of the licensed products and providing that one of the manufacturers would license other manufacturers under the patents of each manufacturer, subject to similar price fixing, violated Sherman Act § 1. The Court further held that the licensees who, with knowledge of such arrangements, entered into the price-fixing licenses thereby became party to a hub-and-spoke conspiracy in violation of Sherman Act § 1.