Water supply in Sierra Leone

Water supply and sanitation in Sierra Leone
Data
Water coverage (broad definition)58% (2015)
Sanitation coverage (broad definition)15% (2015)
Continuity of supplynot available
Average urban water use (L/person/day)40
Average urban water and sanitation tariff (US$/m3)0.22
Share of household metering20%
Annual investment in WSSUS$12m in 2000 (US$2 per capita and year)
Share of self-financing by utilitiesNone
Share of tax-financing15–20% in 2000
Share of external financing80–85% in 2000
Institutions
Decentralization to municipalitiesIn progress (decided in 2004)
National water and sanitation companySierra Leone Water Company (Salwaco)
Water and sanitation regulatorNone
Responsibility for policy settingMinistry of Energy and Water
Sector lawGuma Valley Water Company in Freetown, Salwaco and local councils

Water supply in Sierra Leone is characterized by limited access to safe drinking water. Despite efforts by the government and numerous non-governmental organizations, access has not much improved since the end of the Sierra Leone Civil War in 2002, stagnating at about 50% and even declining in rural areas. In the capital Freetown, taps often run dry. It is hoped that a new dam in Orugu, for which China committed financing in 2009, will alleviate water scarcity.

With a new decentralization policy, embodied in the Local Government Act of 2004, responsibility for water supply in areas outside the capital was passed from the central government to local councils. In Freetown the Guma Valley Water Company remains in charge of water supply.

A 2005 report says that wide-scale corruption is a major problem in the sector. It continues to say that there is a lack of trust between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the public water company Salwaco, which was "suspicious to NGOs". A decision by Salwaco to use only German Kardia hand pumps was controversial, since they are more than twice as expensive as the India Mark II pumps preferred by many NGOs.