Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
| Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif | |
|---|---|
| Decided May 26, 2015 | |
| Full case name | Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif |
| Citations | 575 U.S. 665 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Alito (in part) |
| Concurrence | Alito (in part) |
| Dissent | Roberts, joined by Scalia; Thomas (Part I only) |
| Dissent | Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. art. III | |
Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent.