Wilkinson v. Garland
| Wilkinson v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 28, 2023 Decided March 19, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Situ Kamu Wilkinson v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
| Docket no. | 22-666 |
| Citations | 601 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Petition for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed and denied, No. 21-3166 (3rd Cir. 2022) |
| Holding | |
| Federal courts have the jurisdiction to review the determinations of immigration judges as a mixed question of law. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
| Concurrence | Jackson (in judgment) |
| Dissent | Roberts |
| Dissent | Alito, joined by Roberts, Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and Real ID Act | |
Wilkinson v. Garland, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that federal courts have the jurisdiction to review the determinations of immigration judges as a mixed question of law.