Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
| Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District | |
|---|---|
| Argued February 24, 1993 Decided June 18, 1993 | |
| Full case name | Zobrest et al. v. Catalina Foothills School District |
| Docket no. | 92-94 |
| Citations | 509 U.S. 1 (more) 113 S. Ct. 2462; 125 L. Ed. 2d 1 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 963 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1989) |
| Holding | |
| A school must continue to provide an interpreter under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act even if the child elects to attend a religious school; to do so does not violate the Establishment Clause. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Souter (in full); Stevens, O'Connor (Part I) |
| Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Stevens |
| Laws applied | |
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a school must continue to provide an interpreter under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act even if the child elects to attend a religious school; to do so does not violate the Establishment Clause.