McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
| McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
|---|---|
| Decided April 3, 2017 | |
| Full case name | McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Docket no. | 15-1248 |
| Citations | 581 U.S. 72 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan |
| Concur/dissent | Ginsburg |
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.